ISSN: 2690-0777
Open Journal of Environmental Biology
Short Communication       Open Access      Peer-Reviewed

Viable but non-cultivable bacteria and their implications for microbiological safety

Jiménez-Moleón MC* and Solano-Gómez JA

Inter-American Institute of Technology and Water Sciences, Autonomous Mexico State University, México
*Corresponding author: Jiménez-Moleón MC, Ph.D, Inter-American Institute of Technology and Water Sciences, Autonomous Mexico State University, México, Tel: +52 722 296 55 50 ext. 115; Fax: +52 722 296 55 50 ext. 126; E-mail: mcjimenezm@uaemex.mx
Received: 12 April, 2022 | Accepted: 31 May, 2022 | Published: 01 June, 2022

Cite this as

Jiménez-Moleón MC, Solano-Gómez JA (2022) Viable but non-cultivable bacteria and their implications for microbiological safety. Open J Environ Biol 7(1): 014-016. DOI: 10.17352/ojeb.000028

Copyright

© 2022 Jiménez-Moleón MC, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Communication

Bacteria are microorganisms found in all environments and they fulfill various tasks in ecosystems, however, some can affect the human population causing outbreaks of disease and death. The most common forms of exposure and infection are contaminated food and water. That is the reason there are different organizations in the world that study the incidence of gastrointestinal and/or enteric diseases. For example, in the United States, there is the Active Surveillance Network of Foodborne Diseases (Food Net), which monitors 10 sites for infections that are diagnosed in the laboratory by eight pathogens (Campylobacter, Cyclospora, Listeria, Salmonella, Shigella, Vibrio, Yersinia y Escherichia coli). Their data, in 2019, revealed 25,866 infections; 6,164 cases requiring hospitalization, and 122 deaths. Without forgetting that, according to the WHO, diarrhea remains the second cause of death in children under 5 years in the world, which translated (in 2019) into the death of 525,000 children globally and 9,904 in Latin America [1].

Trying to reduce these figures, the authorities implement regulations and standards that specify the limits of abundance and methods for the detection of pathogenic microorganisms, which are usually based on cultivation techniques in Petri dishes where the Colony Forming Units are counted. So, if a plate shows a clean culture medium (without colonies), the sample is considered to be free of bacteria and therefore safe. That is, the microbiological safety of a sample is measured by the cultivability of the species present in it.

However, in 1982, Xu, et al. discovered the existence of the Viable but Non-Culturable (VBNC) state. Which was defined as a tactic of non-spore-forming bacteria to survive in front of environmental stressors, which include the most common disinfection methods such as exposure to UV light [2], antibiotics [3], chlorine [4], high or low temperatures [5], high or low pH levels [6], as well as food preservation processes such as salting [7], dehydration [8] or freezing [9], which were considered "safe".

Upon entering into the VBNC state, the cell undergoes certain changes, for example, morphological alterations ranging from size reduction [5], to changes in the composition of the cell wall and membrane, including proteins, fatty acids, and peptidoglycan [10]. Other modifications are the decrease in metabolic rate [11], microorganisms showing greater physical, and chemical resistance [12] and antibiotics, which differ in gene expression, change their adhesion properties [13] and their potential for virulence, since some cannot cause diseases until they recover their cultivable state, although others maintain their pathogenicity by continuing to express toxins [14].

However, VBNC bacteria differ from dead cells since their membranes are not damaged and retain genomically or plasmid DNA, maintain their respiratory and metabolic activity, and even possess high levels of ATP [15], but decrease nutrient transport and macromolecule synthesis [16]. Despite the above, they don’t replicate, therefore, they are not quantified by conventional methods such as Most Probable Number (MPN) or Plate Count Agar (PCA), since these techniques are based on counts of bacterial colonies developed on a Petri plate, a liquid or semi-solid medium, during incubation, that is, on their cultivability.

In addition, it has been discovered that VBNC bacteria can be resurrected when the environment becomes favorable again. The term “resuscitation” refers to the fact that they recover their ability to cultivate and return their physiological characteristics and metabolic processes to normal. This resuscitation can be reached by stimulating factors such as an increase in nutrient concentration, increase or decrease in temperature, the presence of chemical stimuli, co-culture with host cells [16], quorum sensing autoinducers (cell-cell communication system), active proteins (factors that promote resuscitation Rpfs, YeaZ and catalase) [4]. However, it is important to mention that bacteria in the VBNC state can only be resurrected within a specific period in the so-called "resuscitation window", their duration depends on the species, bacterial age, and the conditions that induced the VBNC state and the resuscitation conditions. If they exceed this window, VBNC cells can still survive for some time, but eventually die [14].

At this time, it is important to remember again that the standard techniques to know the bacteriological quality of the different matrices are based on the count of the Colony Forming Units (CFUs) using solid, liquid, or semi-solid culture media, but since VBNC bacteria are not able to form colonies, these methods do not allow to count the real number of viable bacteria present and underestimate the microbiological contamination. To avoid this serious microbiological safety problem in different matrices, there are viable bacterial detection methods such as [17]: fluorescence microscopy including staining with acridine orange and nalidixic acid or countersanctions with 5-cyano-2,3-ditolyl tetrazolium chloride (CTC) and 4,6-diamino-2-phenylindole chloride (DAPI) or molecular methods such as quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) combined with monoazide propidium (PMA) or reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR).

Currently, a large number of bacteria entering the VBNC state and even some species of fungi have been identified [14]. Most bacteria are Gram-negative, although there are also Gram-positive and several of them, are pathogenic [18]. In fact, it is considered that most non-specific food infections may be related to the resuscitation of bacteria that entered the VBNC state during their previous handling.

The existence and significance of VBNC bacteria within the "human system" has been presented, but what about these bacteria in the VBNC state in the environment? In the marine environment, many bacteria have been associated with dormancy, typified as the VBNC state [19]. Bacteria found in the sea are exposed to a natural environment that has various stressors that cause the induction of the VBNC state [20,21]. As in other matrices, later, when they come into contact with stimuli such as increased temperature, they resurrect.

An example of its importance is the bacteria of the Vibrio genus that are found in estuarine and brackish surface waters, this pathogen is the cause of diseases in animals and humans such as infections, diarrhea, cholera, gastroenteritis, and septicemia [20,22]. People can come into contact with these microorganisms through food, such as eating oysters, which are products that are usually consumed raw or undercooked. When these mollusks are contaminated with Vibrio vulnificus, they cause infections such as gastroenteritis with abdominal pain, diarrhea, and vomiting, which can progress to primary septicemia. It has been reported that these bacteria enter the VBNC state due to exposure to low temperatures (during the winter months) and that they can resuscitate both when the season changes (and they are in warm environments), and by stimulation with bacteria that are not in the VBNC state, by cell-cell communication (quorum sensing signaling) [23-26]. Also, it has been detected that cholera outbreaks caused by Vibrio cholerae 01 are related to human contact with fresh or saltwater, a medium in which the bacteria can enter or leave the VBNC state depending on the environmental temperature, determined by the seasons of the year [21,22]. The aforementioned are examples of the behavior of VBNC microorganisms in the environment and the importance of their presence for public health.

Conclusion

Bacteria in the VBNC state represent a risk to human health, even in the field of public health. They are often associated with diseases transmitted by water or food. The entry into this state prevents its detection by conventional techniques, based on growth and plate counting, which leads to the underestimation of pathogens since these are the methods that mark the official standards of different countries. Because of this, it is relevant to include complimentary techniques which evaluate the viability of bacteria and not only their cultivability within the regulations that safeguard microbiological safety in different matrixes (beverages, food, biosolids, etc.).

  1. WHO. Diarrhoeal disease. World Health Organization. 2019.
  2. Zhang S, Ye C, Lin H, Lv L, Yu X. UV disinfection induces a VBNC state in Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Environ Sci Technol. 2015 Feb 3;49(3):1721-8. doi: 10.1021/es505211e. Epub 2015 Jan 26. PMID: 25584685.
  3. Pasquaroli S, Zandri G, Vignaroli C, Vuotto C, Donelli G, Biavasco F. Antibiotic pressure can induce the viable but non-culturable state in Staphylococcus aureus growing in biofilms. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2013 Aug;68(8):1812-7. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkt086. Epub 2013 Mar 20. PMID: 23515246.
  4. Ye C, Lin H, Zhang M, Chen S, Yu X. Characterization and potential mechanisms of highly antibiotic tolerant VBNC Escherichia coli induced by low level chlorination. Sci Rep. 2020 Feb 6;10(1):1957. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-58106-3. PMID: 32029755; PMCID: PMC7005040.
  5. Wei C, Zhao X. Induction of Viable but Nonculturable Escherichia coli O157:H7 by Low Temperature and Its Resuscitation. Front Microbiol. 2018 Nov 13;9:2728. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.02728. PMID: 30555428; PMCID: PMC6282054.
  6. Wasfi R, Abdellatif GR, Elshishtawy HM, Ashour HM. First-time characterization of viable but non-culturable Proteus mirabilis: Induction and resuscitation. J Cell Mol Med. 2020 Mar;24(5):2791-2801. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.15031. Epub 2020 Feb 7. PMID: 32030883; PMCID: PMC7077546.
  7. Makino SI, Kii T, Asakura H, Shirahata T, Ikeda T, Takeshi K, Itoh K. Does enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157:H7 enter the viable but nonculturable state in salted salmon roe? Appl Environ Microbiol. 2000 Dec;66(12):5536-9. doi: 10.1128/AEM.66.12.5536-5539.2000. PMID: 11097946; PMCID: PMC92500.
  8. Asakura H, Makino S, Takagi T, Kuri A, Kurazono T, Watarai M, Shirahata T. Passage in mice causes a change in the ability of Salmonella enterica serovar Oranienburg to survive NaCl osmotic stress: resuscitation from the viable but non-culturable state. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2002 Jun 18;212(1):87-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2002.tb11249.x. PMID: 12076792.
  9. Lindbäck T, Rottenberg ME, Roche SM, Rørvik LM. The ability to enter into an avirulent viable but non-culturable (VBNC) form is widespread among Listeria monocytogenes isolates from salmon, patients and environment. Vet Res. 2010 Jan-Feb;41(1):8. doi: 10.1051/vetres/2009056. Epub 2009 Oct 2. PMID: 19796607; PMCID: PMC2775167.
  10. Muela A, Seco C, Camafeita E, Arana I, Orruño M, López JA, Barcina I. Changes in Escherichia coli outer membrane subproteome under environmental conditions inducing the viable but nonculturable state. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2008 Apr;64(1):28-36. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2008.00453.x. Epub 2008 Mar 3. PMID: 18318713.
  11. Shleeva M, Mukamolova GV, Young M, Williams HD, Kaprelyants AS. Formation of 'non-culturable' cells of Mycobacterium smegmatis in stationary phase in response to growth under suboptimal conditions and their Rpf-mediated resuscitation. Microbiology (Reading). 2004 Jun;150(Pt 6):1687-1697. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.26893-0. PMID: 15184555.
  12. Signoretto C, Lleò MM, Tafi MC, Canepari P. Cell wall chemical composition of Enterococcus faecalis in the viable but nonculturable state. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2000 May;66(5):1953-9. doi: 10.1128/AEM.66.5.1953-1959.2000. PMID: 10788366; PMCID: PMC101439.
  13. Li L, Mendis N, Trigui H, Oliver JD, Faucher SP. The importance of the viable but non-culturable state in human bacterial pathogens. Front Microbiol. 2014 Jun 2;5:258. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00258. PMID: 24917854; PMCID: PMC4040921.
  14. Dong K, Pan H, Yang D, Rao L, Zhao L, Wang Y, Liao X. Induction, detection, formation, and resuscitation of viable but non-culturable state microorganisms. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf. 2020 Jan;19(1):149-183. doi: 10.1111/1541-4337.12513. Epub 2019 Dec 19. PMID: 33319518.
  15. Oliver JD. The viable but nonculturable state in bacteria. J Microbiol. 2005 Feb;43 Spec No:93-100. PMID: 15765062.
  16. Zhao X, Zhong J, Wei C, Lin CW, Ding T. Current Perspectives on Viable but Non-culturable State in Foodborne Pathogens. Front Microbiol. 2017 Apr 4;8:580. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00580. PMID: 28421064; PMCID: PMC5378802.
  17. Bodor A, Bounedjoum N, Vincze GE, Erdeiné Kis Á, Laczi K, Bende G. et al. Challenges of unculturable bacteria: environmental perspectives. Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology. 2020; 19(1):1-22.
  18. Ramamurthy T, Ghosh A, Pazhani GP, Shinoda S. Current Perspectives on Viable but Non-Culturable (VBNC) Pathogenic Bacteria. Front Public Health. 2014 Jul 31;2:103. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2014.00103. PMID: 25133139; PMCID: PMC4116801.
  19. Zhang XH, Ahmad W, Zhu XY, Chen J, Austin B. Viable but nonculturable bacteria and their resuscitation: implications for cultivating uncultured marine microorganisms. Marine Life Science & Technology. 2021; 3(2): 189-203.
  20. Vezzulli L, Colwell RR, Pruzzo C. Ocean warming and spread of pathogenic vibrios in the aquatic environment. Microb Ecol. 2013 May;65(4):817-25. doi: 10.1007/s00248-012-0163-2. Epub 2013 Jan 3. PMID: 23280498.
  21. Colwell RR. Viable but nonculturable bacteria: a survival strategy. J Infect Chemother. 2000 Jun;6(2):121-5. doi: 10.1007/pl00012151. PMID: 11810550.
  22. Binsztein N, Costagliola MC, Pichel M, Jurquiza V, Ramírez FC, Akselman R, Vacchino M, Huq A, Colwell R. Viable but nonculturable Vibrio cholerae O1 in the aquatic environment of Argentina. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2004 Dec;70(12):7481-6. doi: 10.1128/AEM.70.12.7481-7486.2004. PMID: 15574951; PMCID: PMC535145.
  23. Ayrapetyan M, Williams TC, Oliver JD. Interspecific quorum sensing mediates the resuscitation of viable but nonculturable vibrios. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2014 Apr;80(8):2478-83. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00080-14. Epub 2014 Feb 7. PMID: 24509922; PMCID: PMC3993182.
  24. Froelich BA, Noble RT. Factors affecting the uptake and retention of Vibrio vulnificus in oysters. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2014 Dec;80(24):7454-9. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02042-14. Epub 2014 Sep 26. PMID: 25261513; PMCID: PMC4249221.
  25. Tack DM, Ray L, Griffin PM, Cieslak PR, Dunn J, Rissman T, Jervis R, Lathrop S, Muse A, Duwell M, Smith K, Tobin-D'Angelo M, Vugia DJ, Zablotsky Kufel J, Wolpert BJ, Tauxe R, Payne DC. Preliminary Incidence and Trends of Infections with Pathogens Transmitted Commonly Through Food - Foodborne Diseases Active Surveillance Network, 10 U.S. Sites, 2016-2019. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020 May 1;69(17):509-514. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6917a1. PMID: 32352955; PMCID: PMC7206985.
  26. Xu HS, Roberts N, Singleton FL, Attwell RW, Grimes DJ, Colwell RR. Survival and viability of nonculturableEscherichia coli andVibrio cholerae in the estuarine and marine environment. Microb Ecol. 1982 Dec;8(4):313-23. doi: 10.1007/BF02010671. PMID: 24226049.