ISSN: 2640-8007

Research Article
Open Access Peer-Reviewed

**Cite this as**

The Fermat’s theorem is one of the most popular theorems in mathematics. Its condition is formulated simply at the school arithmetic level. However, many mathematicians and laymen have been looking for the proof of the theorem for more than three hundred years. This theorem says that at the same time there are no nonzero integers “a”, “b”, “c”, “n”, for n > 2, which would satisfy the equation:

an+bn=cn, (1).

It was proved in 1994 by A. Wiles and colleagues, [1]. The proposed proof is very good for understanding in a narrow mathematical community. However, we can say that not all specialists in mathematics understand this. Simplification is necessary for a wider range of stakeholders.

For this reason, in particular, an analysis was made and an article was published, [2], in which it was shown that equations with square roots and roots with any degrees from differences can be broken/decomposed up into different terms. This is equation (143) in this article. It was impossible to neglect the attempt to connect the obtained results with the verification of the Fermat’s theorem.

Mathematical modeling in biotechnology, [2 and literature in this article] changed its course since last 3–4 decades with a shift toward situation-specific, complex treatments as opposed to causal, mechanistic and general analyses as in the past. Common patterns/theories of a cell population growth do not receive much emphasis unlike in the past, specifically the well-known variations from Monod’s model. On the other hand, development of fermentation technology focused only on improving fermenter technology and automation. Thus, the mathematical and physical (biological) problems of microbial growth and biosynthesis, both in the general case as well as in specific applications, remained unattended too.

The author of this article published a preprint, [3], with his own proof of FLT, which at the time of the writing has not yet received serious objections to the presented proof of FLT, despite the fairly wide distribution of this preprint among the professional community of “pure mathematics”.

2.1.1 The Equation (143) from [2], which was used as the basis for the proof:

a = (cn-bn)(1/n) = (ε/γ)(1/n)[(cn)(1/n) Φ(n-1)/n – φ(n-1)/n ((bn)/γ)1/n], (2)

Naturally, the inverse calculation of “b” through “a” is also possible.

2.1.2 «a», «b», «c», «n» are integers for the case considered in this article, and a = pA, b = pB, c = pC, where “p” is any other integer. The Pythagorean primitive triples “A”, “B”, “C” are the minimum integers greater than 1 that satisfy to the condition (1), as well as the numbers “a”, “b” and “c”, moreover, a < b and c > b;

2.1.3 C0=Cn/Φ2 is the ratio of Cn to the number Φ2, where Φ=1/φ=1/0.6180339…=1.6180339…

2.1.4 γA= An/C0 , (3)

and

γB= Bn/C0 (4)

Here the indices “A” or “B” with the numbers “γ” indicate through which parameter this “γ” is calculated. Accordingly, for the “γA” value, the calculation was carried out through the parameter “A” for the further purpose of the “B” value study and vice versa. Naturally, it is possible to use «a», «b», «c» to determine γa and γb;

2.1.5 ε=Φγ-φγ2 (5)

The values obtained in accordance with paragraph 2.1.4. are used for calculations in Equation (5).

2.1.6 The calculation results for paragraphs 2.1.2.-2.1.5. shown in the Table 1.

2.2.1 Let the first term on the right of the Equation (2) be «L» and the second term on the equation be «M».

i.e., LA=(Φn-Φn-2γA)1/nC, (6),

and LB=(Φn-Φn-2γB)1/nC, (7).

The Equations (6) and (7) were obtained at simplifying of the first term in the right-hand side of equation (2). Calculations are made through “A” or “B” upon receipt of values corresponding to “B” or “A”. That is, the Equation (3) is used in the analysis of “B” values, and the Equation (4) is used in the analysis of “A” values. Accordingly, the values with the corresponding indices “LA” and/or “LB” in the form of the Equations (6) and (7) were obtained after simplification.

The Equations for the quantities “MA” and “MB” were also obtained similarly to the Equations (6) and (7):

MA= (φn-2/γA–φn)1/nA, (8),

and MB=(φn-2/γB–φn)1/nB, (9).

2.2.2 The joint solution of the Equations (6), (8) and (7), (9) by equating the factors “γA” and “γB” in each of the corresponding equations allows us to write the following expressions:

ΦnCn/LAn - φnAn/MAn=1, (10),

and

ΦnCn/LBn - φnBn/MBn=1, (11).

2.2.3 The Equations (10) and (11) can be represented as follows:

(Φn/2Cn/2/LAn/2 - φn/2An/2/MAn/2) (Φn/2Cn/2/LAn/2 + φn/2An/2/MAn/2)=1, (12),

and (Φn/2Cn/2/LBn/2-φn/2Bn/2/MBn/2) (Φn/2Cn/2/LBn/2+ φn/2Bn/2/MBn/2)=1, (13).

2.2.4 The solution of the Equations (12) and (13) for n = 2 and other values completely excludes Φ and φ, if we take into account the Equations from sections 2.1.1.-2.1.4. and 2.2.1-2.2.2. This allows us to express the Equations (12) and (13) only by the integers “A”, “B” and “C” according to the Equations:

(k-A k+A)={C/[(C2-A2)1/2]-A/[(C2-A2)1/2]}{C/[(C2-A2)1/2]+A/[(C2-A2)1/2]}=1, (14).

and

(k-B k+B)={C/[(C2-B2)1/2]-B/[(C2-B2)1/2]}{C/[(C2-B2)1/2]+B/[(C2-B2)1/2]}=1, (15).

2.2.4.1 It is obvious, the values “k-” and “k+” will belong to rational fractions or integers if “A”, “B” and “C” are integers. Moreover, k- < 1 and k+ > 1. This is shown in Table 2.

Thus,

k-B =1/A, (16),

and

k+B= A, (17),

if the primitive triples “A”, “B” and “C” are defined by the Equations:

B=(A2-1)/2, (18),

and

C=(A2+1)/2, (19),

for example.

2.2.4.2 The difference between “L” and “M” gives the integers “A” and “B”, respectively, for pairs of numbers “LB” - “MB” and “LA” - “MA”. It can be seen in the Table 2.

2.2.5 The solution of equations (12) and (13) for n = 3 and other conditions n> 2 gives irrational values, if we will take into account the Equations from sections 2.1.1.-2.1.4. and 2.2.1-2.2.2., and this prohibits the possibility of obtaining solutions that consist of integers for the given cases, see Table 1.

The Equation (18) in the article [2], devoted to the binary doubling in microbial populations at a slow growth phase, is the initial equation for the consideration in this article:

K’= (Xp-XLim)XstLim (20),

where K ’is a constant; Xp is a certain value equal to the asymptote during population growth in the decaying growth phase; XLim is the number of cells at the interface between the exponential phase of population growth and the phase of damped growth; XstLim - the number of non-dividing cells at the age of 0 cell cycle. The main premise of this microorganism growth model (IMMD) is the assumption that the total number of cells, X, is always determined by the sum of non-dividing cells, Xst, and dividing cells, Xdiv:

X=Xst+Xdiv, (21).

An analysis of the Equations (20) and (21) according to the scheme in paragraph 2 of this article shows that if X values belong to the set of integers, then Xst and Xdiv values can belong to the set of irrational numbers. It is obviously for X, if that value is expressed by integers, then this number can be the square of another integer, C = X1/2. The numbers Xst and Xdiv can have irrational values A=(Xst)1/2 and B=(Xdiv)1/2, except for the τFinal value, when XFinal = XstFinal and XdivFinal=0, [2]. The biological significance of this phenomenon can only be explained by the fact that there is no sharp boundary between the properties of Xst and Xdiv cells, which are close in the age of its cell cycles. This refers to the situation if 2 daughter cells have just come from one parent cell and one of them has entered into the Xdiv state through some small time interval compared to the doubling time, td, and the second has remained in the Xst state.

But, it is obvious, the Equations (12) and (13) can also have integer solutions according to paragraph 2. This is acceptable for the case if we assume that C = X1/2 and B = (Xnew)1/2, where the Xnew values should be considered as “new” cells, [2], which were formed after some fixed reference time. For example, after a time corresponding to the time for the boundary between the exponential growth phase and the slow growth phase, τLim. Accordingly, cells, which were already existing in a population at the given time, τLim , are “old” cells, Xold, [2]. Moreover, A = (Xold)1/2, where A values is also an integer, like «C» and «B» values. At τ = τFinal, both components, Xnew or Xold, cannot be equal to 0.

It’s obvious that:

X=Xold+Xnew, (22).

Thus, the equality is true:

(Xst+Xdiv)/(Xold+Xnew) = 1, (23).

Indeed, the Equations (24) - (27) below gives the solutions of the Equation (23):

X=Xp-(Xp-XLim)e[-(m/a)(τ-τLim )], (24),

Xdiv=X-Xst= X-K’/(Xp-X), (25),

Xold=XLime[-(m/a)(τ-τLim)], (26),

Xnew=Xp(1-e[-(m/a)(τ-τLim)]), (27),

where «m» and «a» values are the maintenance energy and trophic coefficient (it is not the same as the «a» value used above in the Equations (1) and (2)). The Equations (26) and (27) were firstly shown in [4], however, with an incorrect interpretation like Xdiv and Xst, respectively.

Taking into account all the equations of this article and article [2], it was shown that the development of populations can be determined by the Fermat’s theorem and the Pythagorean Theorem, as a special case of Fermat’s theorem. The reason is: there are no other possibilities for the Nature, except n = 2.

The Fermat’s theorem and Pythagorean Theorem can be used by a relatively simple algebraic way to analyze S-shaped growth curves of microorganisms.

Application in practical biology for describing of population growth was proposed to show essential features in interpretations of belonging to different groups of cells.

- Andrew Wiles (1995) Modular elliptic curves and Fermat’s last theorem. Annals of Mathematics Journal 141: 443-551. Link: https://bit.ly/3vnIGIW
- Sergey P Klykov (2020) S-shaped growth cwurves in fermentations and golden ratio. International Journal of Biomathematics 13: 30.
- Sergey P. Klykov (2021) On the issue of the relationship between fermat’s last theorem, flt, and the pythagorean theorem. DOI: 10.13140 / RG.2.2.36466.02243. Link: https://bit.ly/3wxriRW
- Biryukov VV (2011) A Structurized Model for Biomass Growth during Oxygen-Limited Fermentation Biotechnology 4: 65-72.

© 2021 Klykov SP. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Subscribe to our articles alerts and stay tuned.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Help ?

**PTZ:** We're glad you're here. Please click "create a new query" if you are a new visitor to our website and need further information from us.

If you are already a member of our network and need to keep track of any developments regarding a question you have already submitted, click "take me to my Query."