Autologous flap reconstruction as a unique opportunity for weight loss and breast cancer risk reduction: A case report

Objective: The purpose of this paper is to discuss how autologous fl ap reconstruction following mastectomy can serve as a unique opportunity for patients with breast cancer to reduce their risk of recurrence through weight reduction in the pre-operative, intraoperative and postoperative phases of healing. Background: Autologous mastectomy reconstruction with tissue from the lower abdomen is common. Patients, with breast cancer, who test positive for the BRCA gene are known to have a survival benefi t from prophylactic mastectomy. It is also known that satisfaction for autologous breast reconstruction is high in the patient population with a high body mass index (BMI). This population has the unique opportunity to further reduce their risk of breast cancer through weight loss. Methods: Prior to surgery, our patients are instructed to consume a high protein diet intake on the magnitude of 1-2 grams per/kg of body weight which was on average 80-100 grams of protein per day. A case report chart review was conducted on a breast cancer patient who underwent autologous breast reconstruction with deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) fl aps. The patient had a high body mass index on the initial presentation of their breast cancer diagnosis. After the bilateral mastectomies, the patient lost additional weight after the completion of autologous fl ap reconstruction. Results: Our patient with a high body mass index, who underwent bilateral mastectomy with autologous fl ap reconstruction, was followed between 2018 and 2020. Aesthetic outcome and weight loss following reconstruction was evaluated at various time points. Weight loss, as documented in chart review and patient report, was examined as well as before and after photographs post autologous fl ap reconstruction. Conclusions: Bilateral mastectomy is a common procedure and typical among patients with BRCA positivity or other strong family history of breast cancer. Although mastectomy reduces the risk of recurrence, the risk reduction is not zero. Breast cancer patients often wish to complete all possible modalities to reduce their risk of recurrence. We have found that weight loss is often a controllable risk factor that patients often choose to pursue. Case Report Autologous fl ap reconstruction as a unique opportunity for weight loss and breast cancer risk reduction: A case report Brian P Dickinson1-4*, Ayushi Patel1,5, Judy Pham1, Nikkie Vu-Huynh1, Monica B Vu1, Heather Macdonald3,6, Abigail Madans3,6, Merry Tetef8, Kevin Lin3, Jennifer Overstreet3, Lucia Vu1 and Peter Ashjian2-4,7 1MD, Department of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, 351 Hospital Road, Suite 415 Newport Beach, CA 92663 CA, USA 2Providence Tarzana Medical Center, Tarzana, CA, USA 3Hoag Hospital Presbyterian, Newport Beach, CA, USA 4Glendale Adventist Medical Center, Glendale, CA, USA 5University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, FL, USA 6University of Southern California, Keck School of Medicine. Los Angeles, CA, USA 7Inc, Glendale, CA, USA 8University of California Los Angeles, USA Received: 25 August, 2020 Accepted: 05 September, 2020 Published: 07 September, 2020 *Corresponding author: Brian P Dickinson, MD, Department of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, 351 Hospital Road, Suite 415 Newport Beach, CA 92663 CA, USA, Tel: 949-612-8632; Fax: 310-861-1478; E-mail:


Introduction
Plastic and reconstructive surgeons, via oncoplastic surgery, have become integral in the oncologic care for patients with breast cancer to evolve the standard of breast cancer care with the goal of eradicating cancer and optimizing aesthetic outcomes [1,2]. Plastic and reconstructive breast surgeons also have the unique opportunity to reduce future breast cancer risk in patients with a high BMI following mastectomy with autologous fl ap reconstruction.
Prior studies have determined that reconstruction satisfaction is high in patients with an elevated body mass index who choose to undergo autologous fl ap reconstruction. When patients present to us and request autologous reconstruction, we emphasize that their high body mass index predisposes them to a higher rate of complications post-operatively. To mitigate the risk of complications, we initiate a diet high in protein to increase albumin and prealbumin levels. The diet is not restrictive in any way; it is supplemented with counting grams of protein intake and eliminating carbohydrates in the evening meals. We simply tell patients that we use the rule of 20s -"A can of tuna fi sh is 25 grams, a chicken breast the size of their palm is 25 grams, three eggs is 25 grams, and a protein shake at night is 30 grams." Compliance with this simple routine daily can help patients exceed 100 grams of protein per day. We have found that when patients attain this level of protein intake, there is little additional room for empty calories, leading to weight loss prior to surgery. This initiates a functional cascade of positive behaviors with infi nitely benefi cial outcomes.
We encounter many patients in our practice who receive a new diagnosis of cancer and have often been healthy throughout their lives. Patients may indicate they never smoked, never consumed alcohol, and ate reasonably throughout the duration of their lives. Other patients test positive for genetic mutations or have a strong family history. One of the easily and readily reversible risk factors for breast cancer in the highly motivated patient is weight loss. We have found with the right education and guidance, weight loss can not only be an empowerment to fi ght breast cancer, but can be a re-introduction to a healthy perspective and new setpoint on health and fi tness.

Materials and methods
A retrospective chart review was conducted on a patient who underwent bilateral autologous free fl ap reconstruction procedure and was followed between 2018 to 2020 by the plastic and reconstructive authors (B.D., P.A.). The patient's weights, self-reports of waist circumference, and photographs were obtained. Satisfaction was assessed subjectively in the chart review.

Results
A 54-year-old female with a strong family history of breast cancer presented with suspicious microcalcifi cations in her right breast which were biopsied and determined to be Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia (ADH). Her mother died of breast cancer at the age of 38 and her maternal aunt developed breast cancer at age 78. Given her history, she underwent genetic screening and additional imaging. Her genetic testing identifi ed her to have a variant of undetermined signifi cance in the RAD51C gene.
Although she was aware this was a negative test, she stated her strong intention to undergo bilateral mastectomy. The initial oncoplastic reconstructive plan included right breast lumpectomy with oncoplastic reconstruction and left breast reduction mastopexy for symmetry. This would allow nipple-  The patient had a high BMI; an incision pattern was drawn with two options. Given her desire for bilateral mastectomy and immediate reconstruction, nipple preservation would not be possible due to the long sternal notch to nipple distance.
The patient was in agreement with removal of the nippleareola complex from an oncologic perspective due to her strong family history of breast cancer. Two incision patterns were drawn-one was a wise pattern closure and the other preserved the skin along the inframammary fold [ Figure 2]. It was explained to the patient that there would be a higher degree of wound complications and skin breakdown because of the larger abdominal fl aps and tension on the T-junction of the wounds.
Given the evolving nature of the patient's workup, we wished to wait to decide intra-operatively which skin pattern would be conducive to optimal healing and aesthetic success and would not delay any possible radiation therapy.
Citation: Dickinson  Radiation is always a possibility following immediate reconstruction. In our case, the autologous fl ap reconstruction had tolerated radiation well. Asymmetry consistent with radiation included an elevated inframammary fold and tightened skin envelope [ Figure 5]. Correction of the asymmetry consisted of contralateral right breast mastopexy/reduction and raising of the right inframammary fold [ Figure 6]. Over the course of her surgical cancer treatment and reconstruction, this patient lost 45 lbs and reduced her BMI from 36.2 to 28.9, changing her BMI classifi cation from obese to overweight.

Discussion
We have encountered many patients in our practices who have a high body mass index and who choose to undergo autologous fl ap reconstruction. Our experience is similar to that encountered nationally where patients with a high body mass index have a high satisfaction rate with autologous fl ap reconstruction [3][4][5]. This may be accounted for by the ability to match the pre-operative breast size. The largest silicone implant available is 800 cc while some mastectomy specimens in patients with high BMI exceed 1000 grams. Autologous fl ap reconstruction also gives patients with a higher BMIs the ability to change their overall body shape and lose weight. We commonly encounter many patients who have been given a new diagnosis of breast cancer and state, "I did everything right my whole life... I don't smoke, I don't drink alcohol, etc." and often a feeling of powerlessness or "unluckiness" ensues. We have found in a subset of patients with a high BMI that safe and

Figure 3:
One year post-operatively from bilateral mastectomy and bilateral autologous fl ap reconstruction. The left reconstructed breast mound was radiated nine months previously in the photograph, radiation was well-tolerated. This is an acceptable aesthetic breast reconstruction which would not require revision despite the autologous fl ap having been radiated. Given the patients desire for weight loss, we proceeded safely with bilateral reduction of the reconstructed breast mounds and revision of the abdominal donor site, which initially had delayed healing. (DCPP) demonstrates a direct relationship between the amount of weight lost and the reduction of breast cancer risk. In this study, women over fi fty who sustained weight loss of greater than 20 lbs had a 26% reduction in breast cancer risk. The analysis excludes women on HRT [5]. The effects of obesity on breast cancer treatment include high recurrence rates, poorer aesthetic outcomes, increased surgical and radiation therapy complications, and decreased effectiveness of chemotherapy and endocrine therapy [6][7][8].
Wang determined in his meta-analysis of over 50,000 patients from 20 cohort studies, that for every 1 kg/m2 increment increase of BMI, the risk of breast cancer lymph node metastasis increased as linear dose-response reaction. [9] Chlebowski determined that there was a lower risk of breast cancer in post-menopausal women who lose weight. [10] Blackburn determined in the Women's Intervention Nutrition Study that risk of breast cancer recurrence was reduced 24% in women who lost an average of 6 lbs. with a low fat diet intervention over those who had regular care. [11] The advantage of multiple-staged procedures for breast cancer reconstruction is that the metabolic rate increases as the body attempts to heal the reconstruction. Furthermore, the protein diet preparation for these surgeries facilitates weight loss which are consistent with associations to reduce breast cancer risk.
Pre-operative increases in daily protein intake helps patients develop nutritional habits that aid in healing and recovery post-operatively, when metabolic demands are high. While autologous fl ap reconstruction does not necessitate entry into the abdominal or thoracic cavity, there are increased, surgery-associated metabolic demands on the integumentary system and a signifi cant volume and surface area of wounds that require healing. In addition, we have encountered many patients who experience early satiety following DIEP fl ap reconstruction secondary to the tightening of the abdominal domain. This early satiety, increased metabolic demand, and proper nutrition can help reduce breast cancer risk in patients with an elevated BMI.
We have encountered obstacles to our premise of autologous reconstruction in patients with a high BMI. Lumpectomy and oncoplastic reconstruction can yield excellent results with a functional breast. Lumpectomy and radiation can be the endpoint of treatment, and mastectomy can be saved for recurrence if it occurs. Weight loss can be initiated after the lumpectomy to reduce risk of recurrence. However, lumpectomy in patients with a high BMI is also not without complications, and similar principles that we discuss below should be utilized to ensure radiation is initiated in a timely fashion. Fisher, et al. believe that autologous reconstruction in obese patients leads to a higher rate of complications with autologous fl ap reconstruction [5]. It is well known that many surgical and anesthetic complications occur as a result of obesity or elevated body mass index. We understand this to be true, and it became our impetus to advocating the high protein diet to minimize complications in these patients. Our goal was to achieve albumin levels of 4.0 g/dL. In general, we would attempt to educate our patients to consume 1.5-2 grams of protein per kg of body weight.
As we initiated our protein nutrition plan prior to surgery, we found many patients lost weight prior to surgery and often HgA1c levels returned closer to normal in the process. To contrast Fisher's points, we try to avoid the free TRAM Figure 5: One week post-operatively from right breast mastopexy reduction and fi nal abdominal donor site scar revision. The right inframammary fold was elevated and the fl ap was debulked superior to the inframammary fold to allow contraction of the fold. Raising an inframammary fold is challenging when the breast mound is heavy and or the abdominal girth is heavy as the fold tends to drop. Radiation has the effect of elevating the inframammary fold.  or MS free TRAM in obese patients and focus on DIEP fl aps to minimize donor site morbidity. This often requires the presence of a superfi cial epigastric vein for backup outfl ow and appropriate perforator anatomy. The importance of high BMI and associated complications should also focus on minimizing mastectomy skin fl ap necrosis and wound healing of the reconstructed breast. This healing is time-sensitive in order to ensure that the breast cancer patient can complete their oncologic therapy which may include adjuvant chemotherapy or radiation therapy. Patients with a higher BMI often have ptotic breasts, so a Wise-pattern mastectomy is often benefi cial aesthetically. If done in an immediate reconstructive setting, the chances of partial-or full-thickness skin necrosis is high as the weight of the fl ap rests against a skin fl ap that lacks a normal venous dependent drainage. If done for prophylactic mastectomy, the skin necrosis that ensues can be addressed with hyperbaric oxygen therapy or can be revised at a later date without consequence. For patients with larger cancers (>5cm) or positive lymph nodes, there is a higher likelihood of adjuvant chemotherapy or radiation, so the selection of a skin pattern that minimizes wound complications is paramount. In our patient, we maintained the inframammary fold skin and kept the autologous fl ap larger to tolerate radiation.
Our case highlights another issue that commonly occurs in the breast reconstruction process. Larger fl aps with a robust blood supply can tolerate radiation well. During an immediate reconstruction, sentinel lymph node biopsies can return positive which may direct radiation therapy postoperatively. When this occurs, we often make more conservative decisions so that we do not negatively affect radiation timing postoperatively.
In this case, we maintained the skin along the inframammary fold instead of completing a Wise pattern which would remove the venous drainage and place heavy autologous fl aps against the repair. Second, we kept the fl aps larger. We have found that larger bulky fl aps tolerate radiation well and often do not require a second stage for symmetry. If a symmetry operation is necessary, the contralateral non-radiated side can usually be reduced or lifted. In our patient's case, we proceeded with delayed bilateral reductions of the autologous fl aps and completed the Wise pattern reduction because she desired to have a smaller breast size. At this second stage the Wise pattern mastectomy skin fl aps have been delayed and exhibit more robust healing, and in this case, healed well.

Summary
Autologous mastectomy reconstruction represents a unique opportunity for the plastic and reconstructive surgery team to reduce breast cancer risk in patients with a high body mass index.
Autologous fl ap mastectomy reconstruction offers patients a durable, natural-appearing reconstruction with an improved body appearance and self-image. The autologous mastectomy fl ap reconstruction in combination with appropriate nutrition and exercise can help minimize breast cancer risk.