ISSN: 2455-8591
International Journal of Immunotherapy and Cancer Research
Mini Review       Open Access      Peer-Reviewed

Novel insights on use of doxorubicin to treat chemoresistant TNBC by Immunotherapy

Tze-Chen Hsieh* and Joseph M Wu

Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, New York Medical College, Valhalla, New York 10595, USA
*Corresponding author: Dr. Tze-chen Hsieh, Department of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, New York Medical College, Valhalla, New York 10595, USA, Tel: 914-594-4062; Fax: 914-594-4058; E-mail: Tze-chen_Hsieh@NYMC.edu
Received: 12 June, 2020 | Accepted: 17 July, 2020 | Published: 18 July, 2020

Cite this as

Hsieh TC, Wu JM (2020) Novel insights on use of doxorubicin to treat chemoresistant TNBC by Immunotherapy. Int J Immunother Cancer Res 6(1): 016-018. DOI: 10.17352/2455-8591.000024

Doxorubicin, a WHO listed essential medicine, is used primarily as a combination of taxane/ anthracycline (doxorubicin)/cyclophosphamide (TAC), for treating malignant diseases including triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). TNBC is a subtype of breast cancer categorized by deficient estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and epidermal growth factor receptor HER-2 [1]. TNBC is challenging to treat due to its genotype and phenotype heterogeneity [2-5], aggressiveness, recurrence [6-10], and resistance to existing therapies. Roughly, 25-45% TNBC patients receiving TAC as preoperative therapy achieve complete response and excellent long-term prognosis [11], while patients who fail TAC have poor prognosis and few therapeutic choices [2]. Specifically, doxorubicin-responsive TNBC patients achieve disease-free status and superb long-term prognosis while non-responders face chemoresistance, metastasis, and limited post-doxorubicin options. To increase curable efficacy and counter drug resistance in TNBC, the discovery of clinically relevant, assayable targets and novel mechanism-based therapies are imperative. Unmet clinical needs that constitute the focus of this communication include: How can doxorubicin-response be improved and therapeutic targets be unraveled? What controls and counters the chemoresistance in treated subjects?

PD-L1 expression and immune escape

The immune checkpoint transmembrane protein, programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) is expressed in a myriad of immune and tumor cells [12,13]. Tumor PD-L1 induces the demise of infiltrating cytotoxic T cells in the tumor environment by binding to receptor PD-1 on T cells [13,14]. As such, PD-L1 acts as a protective shield to counter the host immune surveillance mechanism. In certain cancer cell types, high expression of tumor cell PD-L1 correlates with clinical efficacy in the use of checkpoint blockade therapy where monoclonal antibodies are deployed to disrupt the PD-1/PD-L1 axis [15-20]. Disease- and progression-free survival to immune checkpoint blockade therapy has been shown in melanoma, lung, renal and breast carcinomas, in a small percentage of patients expressing high but not low/undetectable PD-L1 tumors [21-24].

Resistance to doxorubicin and metastasis in tumor cells is linked to the activation of PD-L1 [25]. PD-L1 in tumor cells regulates immunosuppression and tumor escape. An altered tumor immunity, drug resistance and increase in metastasis are among ways by which cancer cells elude chemotherapy [26,27]. We hypothesize that PD-L1 is a novel, cancer stage-independent marker to identify candidate cancer patients including TNBC who present clinical chemoresistance. Testing this hypothesis could help unravel existing gaps in treatment of TNBC, viz. tumor heterogeneity, lack of response to host immunity, and resistance to existing therapies. The outcome is significant because it probes the regulation of PD-L1 in doxorubicin-resistant tumor cells using TNBC as example, advances our knowledge of drug induced chemo- and -immune resistance via upregulation of tumor PD-L1, and facilitates the development of anti-PD-L1 approaches to prevent or treat cancer. We surmise that TNBC patients displaying doxorubicin resistance and metastasis may be amenable to treatment using the immune checkpoint blockade therapy to disrupt the interaction between PD1/PD-L1, thus offering a target-, stage- and cancer type-directed therapy for patients who fails chemotherapy. The efficacy to immune checkpoint inhibitors as gauged by disease-, progression-free survival has been shown in melanoma, lung, renal and breast carcinomas [21-24].

Novel regulation of PD-L1 by NF-κB, subject to modulation by NQO2

The mechanism by which up regulation of PD-L1 alters response to host immunity in tumors, evident by resistance to treatment in patients has not been elucidate. Similarly, how PD-L1 in TNBC is regulated by doxorubicin remains unknown. In our published study, we show that at ≥IC50 resveratrol, a NRH:quinone oxidoreductase (NQO2) inhibitor increases PD-L1 in colon and breast cancer cells including TNBC by activation of nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-κB) (28). In EMT6 syngeneic breast tumor mouse model studies, we found that doxorubicin also induces PD-L1 [29]. We recently showed that in cancer cells treated with supra-pharmacological NQO2 inhibitor doxorubicin, a viable residual cell population remains and expresses greatly elevated PD-L1 accompanied by the activation of NF-κB and induction of DDR (DNA damage response) [29]. These observations suggest that in tumor cells, the acquisition of doxorubicin-resistance occurs in parallel with DDR- and NF-κB-mediated induction of PD-L1. As such, to improve the efficacy of doxorubicin, co-suppression of drug resistance and PD-L1 expression using anti-PD-L1 therapy seems a desirable, yet-to-be-explored therapeutic option. These observations are significant: NF-κB positively controls PD-L1 while NQO2 is inversely associated with an increase in the risk of breast cancer. We hypothesize drug/treatment induced tumor PD-L1 may be associated with drug resistance. In addition, inhibitor of NQO2 can facilitates PD-L1-mediated tumor escape of host immunity and modulate doxorubicin-resistance via NF-κB, provides gain-of-growth by treatment induced resistant tumor cells. It strongly suggests the use of anti-PD-L1-antibody – an underpinning of immune checkpoint inhibitors, as a therapeutic option for TNBC patients who fail the doxorubicin therapy. Tumor PD-L1 may serve as a drug-resistant biomarker and theranostic indicator for cancer patients e.g. TNBC. In addition, PD-L1 promotes tumor cell survival, and escape from host immunity, thus, immune checkpoint blockade therapy can appropriately treat chemoresistance mediated by drug e.g. doxorubicin induced tumor PD-L1 using combination versus single-agent therapy is illustrated (Figure 1). The underlying tenets are: (i) patients expressing low/no PD-L1 tumor cells are candidates for immune checkpoint-responsiveness, via the upregulation of PD-L1, (ii) NF-κB signaling mediates the induction of PD-L1 as well as tumor survival, and (iii) the non-conventional phase II enzyme NQO2 characterized [30,31], plays the novel role of modulating NF-κB response/signaling to facilitate/enhance the elimination of tumor cells by host antitumor immunoregulatory processes.

  1. Hudis CA, Gianni L (2011) Triple-negative breast cancer: an unmet medical need. Oncologist 16: 1-11. Link: https://bit.ly/3ezXbQn
  2. Liedtke C, Mazouni C, Hess KR, André F, Tordai A, et al. (2008) Response to neoadjuvant therapy and long-term survival in patients with triple-negative breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 26: 1275-1281. Link: https://bit.ly/2ClHajZ
  3. Prat A, Parker JS, Karginova O, Fan C, Livasy C, et al. (2010) Phenotypic and molecular characterization of the claudin-low intrinsic subtype of breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res 12: R68. Link: https://bit.ly/2CNfog7
  4. Masuda H, Baggerly KA, Wang Y, Gonzalez-Angulo AM, et al. (2013) Differential response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy among 7 triple-negative breast cancer molecular subtypes. Clin Cancer Res 19: 5533-5540. Link: https://bit.ly/2CGtoZ9
  5. Lehmann BD, Jovanović B, Chen X, Estrada MV, Johnson KN, et al. (2016) Refinement of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Molecular Subtypes: Implications for Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Selection. PLoS One 11: e0157368. Link: https://bit.ly/2WqzLHe
  6. Dent R, Trudeau M, Pritchard KI, Hanna WM, Kahn HK, et al. (2007) Triple-negative breast cancer: clinical features and patterns of recurrence. Clin Cancer Res 13: 4429-4434. Link: https://bit.ly/2ZBE9oD
  7. Schneider BP, Winer EP, Foulkes WD, Garber J, Perou CM, et al. (2008) Triple-negative breast cancer: risk factors to potential targets. Clin Cancer Res 14: 8010-8018. Link: https://bit.ly/2ZzvcfC
  8. De Laurentiis M, Cianniello D, Caputo R, Stanzione B, Arpino G, et al. (2010) Treatment of triple negative breast cancer (TNBC): current options and future perspectives. Cancer Treat Rev 36: S80-86. Link: https://bit.ly/3fB69OU
  9. Chacón RD, Costanzo MV (2010) Triple-negative breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res 12: S3. Link: https://bit.ly/2Ck9Bin
  10. Tate CR, Rhodes LV, Segar HC, Driver JL, Pounder NF, et al. (2012) Targeting triple-negative breast cancer cells with the histone deacetylase inhibitor panobinostat. Breast Cancer Res 14: R79. Link: https://bit.ly/3jcugpf
  11. Gonzalez-Angulo AM, McGuire SE, Buchholz TA, Tucker SL, Kuerer HM, et al. (2005) Factors predictive of distant metastases in patients with breast cancer who have a pathologic complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 23: 7098-7104. Link: https://bit.ly/2DRLCaN
  12. Yamazaki T, Akiba H, Iwai H, Matsuda H, Aoki M, et al. (2002) Expression of programmed death 1 ligands by murine T cells and APC. J Immunol 169: 5538-5545. Link: https://bit.ly/2Zzw9oc
  13. Dong H, Strome SE, Salomao DR, Tamura H, Hirano F, et al. (2002) Tumor-associated B7-H1 promotes T-cell apoptosis: a potential mechanism of immune evasion. Nat Med 8: 793-800. Link: https://bit.ly/2ZBv27v
  14. Hanahan D, Weinberg RA (2011) Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell 144: 646-674. Link: https://bit.ly/3h7U3wP
  15. Akbay EA, Koyama S, Carretero J, Altabef A, et al. (2013) Activation of the PD-1 pathway contributes to immune escape in EGFR-driven lung tumors. Cancer Discov 3: 1355-1363. Link: https://bit.ly/30ismeb
  16. Mittal D, Gubin MM, Schreiber RD, Smyth MJ (2014) New insights into cancer immunoediting and its three component phases--elimination, equilibrium and escape. Curr Opin Immunol 27: 16-25. Link: https://bit.ly/32p93Cw
  17. Lyford-Pike S, Peng S, Young GD, Taube JM, Westra WH, et al. (2013) Evidence for a role of the PD-1:PD-L1 pathway in immune resistance of HPV-associated head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer Res 73: 1733-1741. Link: https://bit.ly/2CclfvT
  18. He J, Hu Y, Hu M, Li B (2015) Development of PD-1/PD-L1 Pathway in Tumor Immune Microenvironment and Treatment for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. Sci Rep 5: 13110. Link: https://go.nature.com/30ijZzg
  19. Noh H, Hu J, Wang X, Xia X, Satelli A, et al. (2015) Immune checkpoint regulator PD-L1 expression on tumor cells by contacting CD11b positive bone marrow derived stromal cells. Cell Commun Signal 13: 14. Link: https://bit.ly/30iE4W1
  20. Kim JM, Chen DS (2016) Immune escape to PD-L1/PD-1 blockade: seven steps to success (or failure). Ann Oncol 27: 1492-1504. Link: https://bit.ly/2WuoFAW
  21. Topalian SL, Hodi FS, Brahmer JR, Gettinger SN, Smith DC, et al. (2012) Safety, activity, and immune correlates of anti-PD-1 antibody in cancer. N Engl J Med 366: 2443-2454. Link: https://bit.ly/30q6NbI
  22. Topalian SL, Sznol M, McDermott DF, Kluger HM, Carvajal RD, et al. (2014) Survival, durable tumor remission, and long-term safety in patients with advanced melanoma receiving nivolumab. J Clin Oncol 32: 1020-1030. Link: https://bit.ly/2Ccm0Ff
  23. Hamid O, Robert C, Daud A, Hodi S, Hwu WJ, et al. (2013) Safety and tumor responses with lambrolizumab (anti-PD-1) in melanoma. N Engl J Med 369: 134-144. Link: https://bit.ly/2ZAR0Hw
  24. Gadiot J, Hooijkaas AI, Kaiser AD, van Tinteren H, van Boven H, et al. (2011) Overall survival and PD-L1 expression in metastasized malignant melanoma. Cancer 117: 2192-2201. Link: https://bit.ly/2B6SRKS
  25. Black M, Barsoum IB, Truesdell P, Cotechini T, Macdonald-Goodfellow SK, et al. (2016) Activation of the PD-1/PD-L1 immune checkpoint confers tumor cell chemoresistance associated with increased metastasis. Oncotarget 7: 10557-10567. Link: https://bit.ly/2B5qyfM
  26. Loi S, Pommey S, Haibe-Kains B, Beavis PA, Darcy PK, et al. (2013) CD73 promotes anthracycline resistance and poor prognosis in triple negative breast cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 110: 11091-11096. Link: https://bit.ly/2ZCQARi
  27. Kim JE, Jang MJ, Jin DH, Chung YH, Choi BS, et al. (2014) Paclitaxel-exposed ovarian cancer cells induce cancer‑specific CD4+ T cells after doxorubicin exposure through regulation of MyD88 expression. Int J Oncol 44: 1716-1726. Link: https://bit.ly/3jfDsJl
  28. Lucas J, Hsieh TC, Halicka HD, Darzynkiewicz Z, Wu JM (2018) Upregulation of PD‑L1 expression by resveratrol and piceatannol in breast and colorectal cancer cells occurs via HDAC3/p300‑mediated NF‑κB signaling. Int J Oncol 53: 1469-1480. Link: https://bit.ly/2Zzr6Ei
  29. Lucas J (2018) Immune Regulation of the Tumor Microenvironment by EZH2: Epigenetic Priming for Immune Oncology Combinations. Ph.D. dissertation. New York Medical College, New York, U.S.A.
  30. Ahn KS, Gong X, Sethi G, Chaturvedi MM, Jaiswal AK, et al. (2007) Deficiency of NRH:quinone oxidoreductase 2 differentially regulates TNF signaling in keratinocytes: up-regulation of apoptosis correlates with down-regulation of cell survival kinases. Cancer Res 67: 10004-10011. Link: https://bit.ly/3jaN8F9
  31. Hsieh TC (2009) Antiproliferative effects of resveratrol and the mediating role of resveratrol targeting protein NQO2 in androgen receptor-positive, hormone-non-responsive CWR22Rv1 cells. Anticancer Res 29: 3011-3017. Link: https://bit.ly/2OLeELz
© 2020 Hsieh TC, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.