ISSN: 2455-8400
International Journal of Aquaculture and Fishery Sciences
Research Article       Open Access      Peer-Reviewed

An Experiment on Growth Performance, Specific Growth Rate (SGR) and Feed Conversion Ratio (FCR) of Rohu (Labeo rohita) and Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) in Tank Based Intensive Aquaculture System

Md. Hashibur Rahman1* and Md. Arifuzzaman2

1Scientific Officer, Research & Management Division, Headquarters, Bangladesh Fisheries Research Institute, Bangladesh
2Department of Aquaculture, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh, Bangladesh
*Corresponding author: Md. Hashibur Rahman, Scientific Officer, Research & Management Division, Headquarters, Bangladesh Fisheries Research Institute, Bangladesh, Tel: +88-01744 145478; Fax: +880-9166559; E-mail: hasibkhan94bfri@gmail.com
Received: 02 September, 2021 | Accepted: 01 October, 2021 | Published: 04 October, 2021
Keywords: Intensive aquaculture growth performance; Floating feed; Feed conversion ratio (FCR)

Cite this as

Rahman MH, Arifuzzaman M (2021) An Experiment on Growth Performance, Specific Growth Rate (SGR) and Feed Conversion Ratio (FCR) of Rohu (Labeo rohita) and Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) in Tank Based Intensive Aquaculture System. Int J Aquac Fish Sci 7(4): 035-041. DOI: 10.17352/2455-8400.000071

Copyright

© 2021 Rahman MH, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

The growth and survival are considered as the crucial factors that should be taken into consideration in any aquaculture system. The experiment was aimed to evaluate the growth performance and subsequent survival rate of the rohu (Labeo rohita) and tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). It is important to evaluate the growth responses in relation to Feed Conversion Ratio (FCR) and assessment of the total production of the culture unit. As per the recommended stocking density of 320 fishes/decimal in intensive aquaculture system 8 fry per tank was released to assess the growth performance, survival and production of both rohu (T1) and tilapia (T2). During experimental period, there were three replications for each treatment and feed was supplied at the rate of 12%, 8%, and 4% of the body weight of rohu and 20%, 15%, and 10% of the body weight of tilapia in 1st, 2nd and 3rd month for T1 and T2, respectively. The initial weight of individual tilapia was 7.52±1.81 gm and 14.75±0.19 gm for T1 and T2, respectively. The mean final weight was 44.01±4.03 g for T1 and 139.94±1.29 for T2. The weight gains of fish were 36.49±4.09 gm and 125.19±1.29 gm for T1 and T2, respectively. The mean percent weight gain of tilapia was higher in T2 (1715.05±0.00) than T1 (485.23±0.00). The Specific Growth Rates (SGR) of T1 and T2 were found 4.98±2.28 and 6.26 ±3.83, respectively. There was significant difference (p>0.05) in term of SGR between the treatments. Feed Conversion Ratio (FCR) in T1 and T2 were 2.86±0.14 and 2.23±0.18, respectively. Higher total production was obtained in T2 (1119.52 gm) than T1 (278.19 gm) with 100% survival in both the treatments. The water quality parameters for both of the species were within the suitable range. This study reveals a promising arena for fish culture in tank-based intensive aquaculture system as an efficient way of overcoming the scarcity of water and land. This culture system may be an excellent way of producing fish in a small parcel of land with securing the propitious production and expected outcomes within a limited period of time.

Introduction

Aquaculture is the fastest growing animal-based food producing sector particularly in developing countries like Bangladesh and its production contributes to the livelihoods, employment and also meet the demand in terms of protein supply, food security and income generation of the increasing number of people throughout the world [1]. The contribution of fisheries sector in 2019-20 was 3.50% to the total GDP of the country and approximately 25.72% to agricultural GDP [2]. Now-a-days, fish production shifting to aquaculture as inland fisheries production has escalated over the years, but the productivity per hectare water area is not yet attained at its optimum [2]. Aquaculture is a great revolution in fisheries sectors which has introduced many effective technologies to rear fish and other aquatic animals and has contribution to escalate the total fish production worldwide. Among various segments of the fisheries sub-sector, the inland aquaculture has generally experienced the fastest growth, with the establishment of latest technologies, species, and intensification and improvement of farming, particularly in pond and tank-based aquaculture, entirely over the country. Aquaculture now provides around half the fish for direct human consumption in Bangladesh and is set to grow further.

The competition between aquaculture and other agricultural sectors is increasing in the context of land and water use. To fulfill the animal protein demand for growing population in Bangladesh intensive fish culture system may be alternative to enhance fish production since fish contributes about 60% of animal protein to our daily food [2]. Therefore, intensive aquaculture is growing to ameliorate the national fish production in the context of population growth and declining land resource to replenish the existing gap. In Bangladesh, conventional semi-intensive aquaculture system is generally followed in case of fish culture besides extensive system. However, with the increasing population land area is declining in Bangladesh. Moreover, fish productions per unit area much higher in intensive aquaculture system compared to semi-intensive and extensive system. Aquaculture ponds are often integrated into conservation and management systems and tank culture are often an efficient way of overcoming the matter of water shortages.

To assess the amount of feed required in percentage increase in size and weight at a particular growth stage in relation to time (SGR) is very important. In this experiment, the stocking density was adjusted to intensive (320 fish/decimal) system achieve the expected result more accurately. The initial and final weight over time but the intermediate data remain unaccustomed calculate growth performance. Therefore, the result is not accurate enough to understand the growth of fish in the intermediary stages of a production cycle [3]. The present study has taken rohu and tilapia as an experimental species for investigation the growth of fish in intensive culture system in concrete tanks by using floating feed.

The aquaculture development and increase in per unit volume of water depends after all artificial feed [4]. Among cyprinids, rohu (Labeo rohita) is the most popular fish species which is cultivated in Indian subcontinent. Rohu is considered as the delicious and prestigious fish species among other Indian major carps for its uniqueness and attributes [5]. Tilapia is very resilient species which may reduce the gap of accelerating worldwide demand for its protein sources and market demand [6]. The use of commercial feed has become a time demanded initiative for the success of cyprinid culture and tilapia under intensive culture conditions particularly rohu along with other carps [7] and tilapia monosex culture.

In the 21st Century, water resources will be at a premium, with water shortages expected after 2025. With such a pressure on this vital resource for aquaculture it will no longer be possible due to the lack of water sources. Competition for this resource will increase with drinking water shortage expected to affect large populations by 2025. This important constraint will have a major bearing on how aquaculture can and will develop in the new millennium, and appropriate technologies and farming systems will be required to address this issue. Shortage of water will become a limiting factor in many areas. Ponds must become more “intensive” with respect to water use (e.g., tank-based intensive culture of fish). Aquaculture ponds can be integrated into water conservation and management systems and tank culture can be an effective way of overcoming the problem of water shortages. These improved methods of tank based intensive aquaculture of tilapia is an efficient way to utilize scare water resources effectively and farmers will get higher production in a small parcel of land.

This study aimed to specify the comparative growth performance, yield and FCR to make a rational decision for get better outcomes from tank-based intensive aquaculture system with the economic affordability of fish farmers. The study finds out the growth performance, production and Feed Conversion Ratio (FCR) of rohu and tilapia focusing on different intermediate sampling stages to have better understanding on growth trends. This culture system may be an applauding way of producing fish in a small parcel of land within a short cycle.

Materials and methods

Experimental site

Concrete made squared shaped tanks under a properly constructed shed were established in the backyard (south of the wet laboratory complex) of the Faculty of Fisheries, Bangladesh Agricultural University (BAU), Mymensingh. Water supply and exchange facility was also satisfactory there. Each tank is of length 1m, width 1m and depth 1.2 m and water volume in each tank was 1 X 1 X 1 =1m3. Among the six tanks, three tanks were used to study the growth, yield and survival of rohu (Labeo rohita) and remaining three tanks used to observe the consecutive performance of tilapia (O. niloticus) in intensive rearing system. Both the fish species was fed with floating to have better understating in various sampling stages.

Experimental tanks

For conducting the experiment, six concrete tanks were used. The bottom of the tank was made smooth and coated with white cement to make the bottom visible and facilitate the cleaning process easily. The outlet pipes of the tanks were closed to prevent water leakage. Siphoning process was followed to clean the tanks. Water was supplied from a deep tube well located near the experiment site.

Experimental design and layout

Mono sex male tilapia (O. niloticus) fry was used as experimental species. For the experiment, two treatments were designed namely T1 and T2 and there were three replications for each. Fry was released at the rate of 8 fry per tank that equivalent to the stocking density of 320 fish per decimal or about 80,000 per hectare with different average initial weight for six tanks individually Table 1, Figure 1.

Selection of feed and feeding frequency

The fishes were fed commercial floating feed named as ‘Mega Feed’ and ‘Quality Feed’ for T1 and T2, respectively. In first 30 days of the experiment, the size of floating feed used for feeding the fish was 0.25 mm. Then the pellets of 0.5 mm were used to fed the fish during the rest experimental period. During experimental period feed was given at the rate of 20%, 15%, and 10% of the body weight in 1st, 2nd and 3rd month, respectively Table 2.

Feeding strategy

The daily ration of fish was adjusted with the body weight. The total amount of ration was divided into two parts and half was supplied to the fish in the morning (9:30am) and the rest half was delivered in the afternoon (4:30pm). During experimental period, there were three replications for each treatment and feed was supplied at the rate of 12%, 8%, and 4% and 20%, 15%, and 10% of the body weight in 1st, 2nd and 3rd month for T1 and T2, respectively. The daily ration was calculated as the following rate in the Table 3.

Sampling of fish

Fish sampling was done by catching all fishes of individual tanks at three days interval. Fishes were caught by using small triangle shaped push net (Figures 2,3). The weighing process was done by an electric balance (MODEL: HKD-620AS-LEDE) in gram. The length was recorded by measuring scale in cm (Figure 3). Sampling was performed in the morning at around 9:00 am prior to delivering feed to observe growth and health conditions.

Aeration installation

Air stone aerators were applied to provide sufficient oxygen powered by electricity. A single air stone was allocated for each tank. The aerator motors were attached with the main structure of the roof of the shed. The aeration was operated for 24 hours during the experimental period.

Study of growth parameters of fish

For evaluating the growth of fish, different growth parameters such as length gain (cm), weight gain (g), percent (%) weight gain, specific growth rate (SGR % per day) and production (kg/ha/100 days) were taken into consideration and were measured using the following formula. The length and weight of fish were measured using centimeter scale and electric balance (Model; HKD-620AS-Led) in grams.

Weight gain (gm) =Mean final weight (gm) – Mean initial weight (gm)

Percent( % )weight gain= Mean final weight ( gm )  Mean initial weight ( gm ) t(days) MathType@MTEF@5@5@+=feaaguart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLnhiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=xfr=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@7F84@

SGR ( % ) per day= logW2-logw1 T2-T1 ×100 MathType@MTEF@5@5@+=feaaguart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLnhiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=xfr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaqcLbqacaqGtbGaae4raiaabkfacaqGGaqcfa4aaeWaaOqaaKqzaeGaaiyjaaGccaGLOaGaayzkaaqcLbqacaqGGaGaaeiCaiaabwgacaqGYbGaaeiiaiaabsgacaqGHbGaaeyEaiabg2da9KqbaoaalaaakeaajugabiGacYgacaGGVbGaai4zaiaabEfacaqGYaGaaeylaiaabYgacaqGVbGaae4zaiaabEhacaqGXaaakeaajugabiaabsfacaqGYaGaaeylaiaabsfacaqGXaaaaiabgEna0kaaigdacaaIWaGaaGimaaaa@5833@

Feed conversion ratio (FCR) = Total amount of feed consumed (gm)/ Wet weight gain (gm)

Daily weight gain ( DWG ) = Mean final weightMean initial weight ( gm ) Mean initial weight ( gm ) ×100 MathType@MTEF@5@5@+=feaaguart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLnhiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=xfr=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@8F5B@

Survival rate= No.of fish harvested No.of fish stocked ×100 MathType@MTEF@5@5@+=feaaguart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLnhiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=xfr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaqcLbqacaqGtbGaaeyDaiaabkhacaqG2bGaaeyAaiaabAhacaqGHbGaaeiBaiaabccacaqGYbGaaeyyaiaabshacaqGLbGaeyypa0tcfa4aaSaaaOqaaKqzaeGaaeOtaiaab+gacaqGUaGaae4BaiaabAgacaqGGaGaaeOzaiaabMgacaqGZbGaaeiAaiaabccacaqGObGaaeyyaiaabkhacaqG2bGaaeyzaiaabohacaqG0bGaaeyzaiaabsgaaOqaaKqzaeGaaeOtaiaab+gacaqGUaGaae4BaiaabAgacaqGGaGaaeOzaiaabMgacaqGZbGaaeiAaiaabccacaqGZbGaaeiDaiaab+gacaqGJbGaae4AaiaabwgacaqGKbaaaiabgEna0kaabgdacaaIWaGaaGimaaaa@6A7E@

Production = No. of fishes harvested × average final weight increases of fishes

Study of water quality parameters

During the experimental period, water quality assessment of the experimental tanks were recorded very intensively two times daily. Water quality parameters especially temperature, DO, pH was measured in the morning and afternoon daily and all the tests were performed in the experimental shed. Different physio-chemical parameters including DO was measured using digital DO meter (Model: CE 225908) in mg/l. Water temperature was measured by using digital thermometer (model: CE 225908) in oC and pH was recorded by digital pH meter (Model: CE 224469).

Data analysis

Collected fish growth and water quality data were recorded in MS Excel 2010. Statistical analysis was done to evaluate the effect of the two treatments (T1 and T2) on the growth of fish were significant or not. Independent sample T-Test was performed to test the significance of difference among different water quality parameters. The entire statistical test was conducted by using SPSS (Statistical Package for Social science) version 16. The graph was prepared by using both MS Excel and SPSS. In compliance with the guidelines for fish research approved by the animal ethics committee, fish experiment was conducted in twelve concrete tanks under an outdoor laboratory shed from 10 May-29 July, 2019.

Results

Fish growth performance

Final weight: The initial weight of individual was 7.52±1.81 gm and 14.75±0.19 gm for T1 and T2, respectively. The final mean weight of fish was 44.01±5.65g for T1 and 139.94±1.29 for T2, respectively with no significant difference (p<0.05) between the treatments Table 4.

Weight gain: This controlled experiment was conducted to assess the growth of tilapia frequently in 3 days interval. In this study, the average weight gain of tilapia for T1 was 36.49±4.09 gm and for T2 was 125.19±1.29 g, respectively. The difference in weight gain is notably remarkable between two treatments. The weight gain of tilapia was higher in T2 than T1 (Table 5). In term of weight gain, in the most sampling stages, the performance in T2 was significantly (p<0.05) higher than T1. In term of growth trend, after about a month, the different trend of weight gain was observed. The higher weight gain in T2 was observed from the 5th sampling. However, it was remarkable increment growth after about a month.

Percent weight gain (%): The mean percent weight gain was higher in T2 (1715.05±0.00) than T1 (485.23±0.00). The higher percent weight (1715.05%) was found in T2 where fishes were fed at the rate of 20%, 15%, and 10% of the body weight in 1st, 2nd and 3rd month with average individual weight of 14.75±0.19 gm (Figure 4).

Feed Conversion Ratio (FCR)

The feed conversion ratio was calculated taking the total feed used into consideration in the experiment. Feed conversion ratio values of floating feed used for feeding the fish in T1 and T2, respectively were 2.86±0.14 and 2.23±0.18 (Figure 5).

Specific Growth Rate (SGR % per day)

The specific growth rates (SGR) of T1 and T2 were found 4.98±2.28 and 6.26 ±3.83, respectively. There was significant difference (p>0.05) in term of SGR between the treatments. The present study determined the percentage growth rate in different sampling stages more frequently which are generally not determined considering the initial and harvesting weight data, and the intermediate data are excluded. For this reason, the fishes were sampled to gain the weight of fish to determine the actual growth performance at particular sampling stages. In this regard, in first month of the production cycle the growth of T2 was higher than that of T1. The SGR of T2 was shown increasing gradually. After that, at the last sampling stage, average trend of SGR was observed (Figures 6-8). More specifically, the significant higher specific growth rates were observed at the middle stage (In between 4th June and 18th June) of the experiment and also in later stages (Table 5, Figure 6).

Total production (g/cm3)

The total productions at the end of the study were 278.19±0.00g and 1119.52±0.00g per cm3 in T1 and T2, respectively (Figure 9). The production was higher in the tanks fed with 20%, 15%, and 10% of the body weight.

Water quality parameters

The mean values of tested water quality parameters such as temperature and DO of the experimental ponds are presented in Table 6. There was no significant difference (p<0.05) in the temperature in morning and evening in both treatments. The difference of dissolved oxygen content was very low between two treatments. The dissolved oxygen contents in both treatments were similar because aerators were installed in all the tanks.

Discussion

In this present study, the difference in weight gain was found between the treatments. The mean initial weight of the rohu in the 3 tanks of T1 was 7.52±1.81 and in the other 3 tanks of T2 was 14.75±0.19. At the end of the experiment, the mean final weight of the fish in T1 was 44.01.77±4.03 and 139.94±1.29 in T2. The mean final weight gain was 36.49±4.09 and 125.19±1.29 in T1 and T2, respectively. The weight gain was higher in T2 which might be due to the fact that fish had taken more amount of feed in almost similar level of water quality [8].

To evaluate the utilization of feed, Feed conversion ratio (FCR) was calculated that was given to the fish as feed supplement. The expected FCR for tilapia ranges from 1.5 to 2.0 [9]. The FCR in present study were 2.86±0.14 and 2.23±0.18 in T1 and T2, respectively. The FCR in T2 was within expected range but in case of T1, it was higher than the accepted value. In this experiment, feed was given following general method of percentage body weight consideration, not considering the satiation level. For this, the supplied feed might remain unused. That is why the feed conversion ratio (FCR) of T1 was higher than expected level as the total amount of delivered feed was taken into consideration during calculating the FCR [10].

The survivability of rohu and tilapia in the present study was 100%. Ahmed, et al. [11] recorded survival rate of tilapia ranged from 82 to 90%. In this study, the highest survivability might be the cumulative result of good water quality parameters due to weekly water exchange, quality feed uses and proper maintenance during culture. This result of 100% survival in both the treatments confirms that indoor tank-based aquaculture systems can be developed in Bangladesh where land is getting scarce natural resource.

The mean total production per cm3 was 278.19 gm and 1119.52 g in T1 and T2, respectively. The production was higher in T2 than T1. Roy [12] stated that the production of GIFT tilapia under different stocking density such as 80, 120 and 160 fish/decimal with feeding 30% protein containing diet at a rate 3-5% body weight were 9.04, 11.97 and 13.91 kg/decimal, respectively. He showed that, the best individual weight gain of fish was 104 gm. In the present study, the production was higher than the finding of Roy [12] if the culture area of tank were corresponded to hectare. The fact of higher production might that the initial weigh of the T2 was than T1 and may be this size group of tilapia prefers and consume more floating feed than the rohu [13]. But the growth performance in relation to FCR was higher in T2 than T1.

Shaha, et al. [14] reported that the water quality parameters for fish culture i.e., temperature 22.6 to 32.5ºC, dissolved oxygen 4.3 to 6.8 mg/l. It is very important to maintain the temperature of the culture unit. The suitable range of tilapia culture is 26 to 320C [15]. The body temperature of fish is related to water temperature, and growth, reproduction and other biological activities are influenced by the temperature largely. The water temperature of the experimental tanks was within the suitable range of tilapia culture. The average value of temperature in T1 was 27.19 ±1.46 and 28.23±1.58 during morning and evening, respectively. In T2, the mean temperature was 28.54±1.43 and 28.65±1.67 in morning and evening, respectively.

Islam [16] reported that tilapia can tolerate dissolved oxygen concentration as low as 0.1 mg/l. Higher level of dissolved oxygen concentration was recorded in the experimental tanks as a result of aerator installation. In the present study, the mean average oxygen content of T1 was 5.58±0.82 and 6.15±0.65 during morning and evening, respectively. In T2, the mean dissolved oxygen content was 5.85±0.85 and 6.58±0.82 in morning and evening, respectively. Tilapia can survive at very low dissolved oxygen content [17-19].

Conclusion

This experiment had an introspective observation to detect consecutive growth performance and yield in relation to FCR. This study finds out an outstanding clarification on the growth performance (T1 and T2) in different sampling stages in relation to supplied feed at various stages of fish growth. It was observed that total production was increased with the increase of stocking density. Overall, this study suggests that tank-based aquaculture can be developed in the indoor system that can ensure 100% survival. This study reveals an outstanding clarification on the growth performance of fish in different sampling stages. From the experiment, it might be suggested that the higher stocking density (320 fish per decimal) performed the better results in T2 than T1. It is possible to produce a higher number of fish in such a improved way from a small parcel of land within a short cycle. However, further study needed to explore the relative cost effectiveness of the culture of rohu and tilapia fish in higher stocking density in tank-based aquaculture system. This study will assist the researchers and academicians who wants to culture rohu and tilapia in intensive aquaculture system by using floating feed.

Authors contribution

The work was carried out in collaboration between both authors. Both authors read and approved the manuscript.

  1. Sultana T, Haque MM, Salam MA, Alam MM (2016) Effect of aeration on growth and production of fish in intensive aquaculture system in earthen ponds. MS Thesis, Department of Aquaculture, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh. Link: https://bit.ly/39VBsCM
  2. DoF (2020) Jatio Matshya Saptaho Shankalan, Department of Fisheries, Ministry of Fisheries and Livestock, Dhaka, Bangladesh 144-145.
  3. Lugert V, Georg T, Jen T, Carsten S, Joachim K (2016) A review on fish growth calculation: multiple functions in fish production and their specific application. Reviews in aquaculture, 8: 30-42. Link: https://bit.ly/3oBpIxL
  4. Shaheen T, Ayub M, Hayat S, Abidi SZA, Tahir S (2000) Impact of different levels on the survival and growth of Labeo rohita at constant level of protein. Pakistan Journal of Fisheries 1: 95-102. Link: https://bit.ly/3imZqvs
  5. FAO (2000) Fishery Statistics (Aquaculture Production), Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy 90: 22-13.
  6. WK Ng, Romano N (2013) A review of the nutrition and feeding management of farmed tilapia throughout the culture cycle. Reviews in Aquaculture 5: 220-254. Link: https://bit.ly/3A0Mcds
  7. Abid M, Ahmed MS (2009) Growth response of Labeo rohita fingerlings fed with different feeding regimes under intensive rearing. Journal of Animal & Plant Sciences 19: 45-49. Link: https://bit.ly/3zWszDl
  8. Alam MN (2009) Effect of stocking density on the growth and survival of Mono-sex Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) fry (GIFT strain) in hapa. MS Thesis. Department of Aquaculture, BAU, Mymensingh 42.
  9. Watanabe WO, Losordo TM, Fitzsimmons K, Hanley F (2002) Tilapia production systemin the Americas: technical advances, trends and challenges. Reviews in Fisheries Science 10: 465-498. Link: https://bit.ly/3B0Syeq
  10. Khan MAH (2013) Effects of traditional and floating feed in carp polyculture, MS Thesis, Department of Aquaculture, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh, Bangladesh.
  11. Ahmed GU, Sultana N, Shamsuddin M, Hossain MB (2013) Growth and production performance of monosex Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) feed with homemade feed in earthen mini ponds. Pak J Biol Sci 16: 1781-1785. Link: https://bit.ly/2Y4lnrQ
  12. Roy R (2009) Effects of stocking density on the growth and survival of GIFT Tilapia fed on formulated diet, MS Thesis, Department of Aquaculture, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh.
  13. Haque ABMM (2014) Optimization Of Stocking Density On Growth And Production Of Mono-sex Tilapia in ponds. MS Thesis, Department of Aquaculture, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh.
  14. Shaha DC, Kundu SR, Hasan MN (2015) Production of organic grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idella) and GIFT tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) using napier grass, Pennisetum purpureum. Journal of Fisheries 3: 233-238. Link: https://bit.ly/3mi3zSe
  15. Khan S, Hossain MS, Hossain MM (2008) Production and economics of GIFT strain of tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) in small seasonal ponds. Progressive Agriculture 19: 97-104. Link: https://bit.ly/3zWYALO
  16. Islam MS (2007) Effect of stocking density on the growth and production of GIFT Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) in ponds. MS Thesis. Department of Aquaculture, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh 54.
  17. Balarin JD, Hatton JP (1979) Tilapia: A guide to Their Biology and Culture in Africa. Unit of Aquatic Pathology, University of Stirling, Scotland 174. Link: https://bit.ly/2Y9kQ7G
  18. Battes K, Constania L, Valencive N, Lordache L, Tarus T (1979) Carp culture in floating cages. Bulletin of Correct piscis 1: 68-95.
  19. Hussain MG, Rahman MA, Akhteruzzaman M (1987) A study on the production of O. niloticus (Linnaeus) under intensive system in Bangladesh. Bangladesh J Fish Res 1: 19-23.