The role of an anesthesıst at the times of natural dısasters

The Word of disaster is originated from dus (bad) and aster (star) in latin language. In italian; disastro, in French ; dèsastre.It means that some natural events can cause harmful outcomes. Lots of natural disasters happened during the history also before humanbeings.They have greatly infl uenced the lives of living creatures whatever their results. The fi rst description of the disaster is thought to have started with “Noah’s Ark “ in human history. Later, it was widely reported in Greek, Mesopotamian and other cultures.

pre-hospital period [1]. In France, anesthesiologists have an important role in pre-hospital and emergency services during disasters [2]. In the 2005 London subway bombing, anesthetists in the helicopter emergency response team have actively worked for the injured, especially in the fi eld amputations [3]. It is not diffi cult to see that these roles are very suitable for an anesthesist. Although the role of anesthesiologists in disaster management is clearly seen, there are certain challenges and questions to implement this model in practice: To clearly defi ne this role beyond anesthetists' daily work routines, to arrange work and planning time, inadequacy in anesthesia education in these areas, Are fi eld interventions covered by insurance? Should legal and other concerns prevent us from disaster preparedness and response? If we stop back in disaster preparedness and intervention, can we neglect as medical?
One of the most important disciplines that make up disaster medicine is anesthesia. Anesthesiologists can take data from the fi eld during disasters, make decisions quickly and conduct a regular rescue operation through leadership. Disaster management is a key competence for anesthesia crisis managers.The role of anesthesiologist in providing quick and fast treatment to injured people is very important in disasters.
The most important part during disasters is the treatment within the fi rst hour which is called as «GOLD CLOCK». It is important as a determinant of whether the patient will survive or not. Triage is one of the most important issues in this period. Resuscitation, establishing of vascular access, planning of suitable fl uid treatments, stabilizing the patient, providing transport, and establishing communication between hospitals are the subjects to be considered during this period [4]. An effective triage system should be simple, time-effi cient, reliable and with minimal error characteristics. Personnel and health professionals in the system should also receive continuous training on this subject [5]. In the literature, there are different classifi cation and scales related to triage and scoring of the injured: AustralasianTriageScale (ATS), The Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS), The Manchester Triage System (MTS), The Emergency Severity Index (ESI) [6]. However, the triage system used in the fi eld is different and the color coding system is used. Red: First priority and immediate action, Yellow: Second priority (within 1 hour), Green: Third degree (up to 3 hours) priority, Black: Fourth degree and dead.
As soon as disaster news is received, elective cases in operating rooms should be postponed, beds in intensive care units should be emptied as much as possible, transportation of patients in need should be ensured, pain management must be taken into consideration in the postoperative period, internal and external communication of hospital should be established (blood bank, intensive care, emergency).
Deaths in disaster situations are mostly due to traumatic brain and spinal cord injury, hepatic and splenic laceration, and pelvic fractures [7]. According to previous earthquake experiences of ASA, the need for surgery during disasters was determined as 15% [8].
Anesthetic management of patients in disaster situations is full of challenges for the anesthetist. Patient knowledge is limited, previous medical history, medications used, allergy status, genetic abnormalities and gastric fullness are unknown, the presence of multiple injuries (vertebrae, pneumothorax, cardiac tamponade.) may cause diffi cult airway problems [9]. When choosing anesthesia method, type of surgical procedure, vital signs of the patient, available resources (equipment, medicine, personnel ..), advantages and disadvantages of anesthesia technique, physical conditions of the environment (electricity, water ..), transportation facilities should be considered [10].
During disaster periods some problems like power cuts, inadequate gas supply and inadequate waste systems may limit the use of mechanical ventilators. If necessity happens 90% we perefer manual ventilation [11]. The patients in hemorrhagic shock in disasters we do not have an ideal intravenous anesthetic agent. The anesthetic management safety should be in small dose increments, no matter which drug is selected [12]. In disaster areas, the star of the fi eld is ketamine according to literature and practical applications. Ketamine, which was started to be investigated in 1959, started to be used clinically in Vietnam war in 1970s [13]. The advantages of ketamine are the absence of respiratory depression, protection of airway refl exes, wide therapeutic range, maintaining hemodynamic stability, rapid onset effect and short half-life [14]. Mulvey, et al. Has well defi ned that ketamine can be a primary anesthetic in disaster situations due to its safety and effect [15]. Succinylcholine (cautions: Burn, Crush syndrome, intraocular and intracranial pressure increase) and high-dose (1mg/kg) rocuronium can be used in in emergency trauma disaster patients who can usually have a full stomach [16]. Because of less side effects, compliance with deep analgesia, hemodynamic stability, high success rate and low electrical power requirement, regional anesthesia is recommended in disasters [14]. The regional techniques used are divided into two as neuroaxial blocks and peripheral nerve blocks. Epidural anesthesia: In disaster situations, this technique can be diffi cult to apply, not recommended. Spinal anesthesia is safe and effective if performed correctly. oxygen availability is not an absolute necessity. Means should be found to overcome resuscitation and possible side effects (eg Hypotension). However, fl uid replacement is important before starting blocks [17].
Peripheral nerve blocks are frequently preferred because of good surgical environment, deep perioperative analgesia, stable hemodynamics, minimal side effects, and the need for simple portable material. Continuous catheter application for epidural or nerve block has been reported in very few publications. Buckenmaier, et al. Reported that catheter application can be used safely [14]. However, inadequate appropriate manpower in mass injuries may complicate follow-up and catheter care. The risk of infection due to environmental factors should not be ignored. Pain management, which is the basic human right, should be considered and evaluated by the team in the fi eld. Effective pain control reduces patient discomfort and complications with early mobilization. The development of neuropathic pain also decreases and reintegration of individuals into society becomes rapid [18]. It is possible to provide a good analgesia, even with few resources. All pain treatment modes can be used. «Pain management planning »should not be forgotten when disaster planning is constructed.

Realworld examples
In a review of 33,410 patients in 31 articles, 2 surveys and reviews covering 15 major earthquakes between 1930 and 2010, traumatic extremity injury was reported as 68% (lower extremity was more than upper as 90%) and cranial, thoracic and abdominal injuries reported as less than 30%. In the studies, only 26% of the anesthesia techniques were reported and the anesthesia techniques were equally distributed. In all studies, perioperative mortality rate was 0-19%. In the studies, it is reported that regional anesthesia was used as the primary technique used intraoperatively for lower extremity injuries after earthquake. However, it has been shown that all types of anesthesia can be used safely and successfully in acute surgical procedures (if the infrastructure, materials and medication are suffi cient). No correlation was found between the anesthetic technique used and the type and incidence of complications [17].  [20].
Due to the tourism season, all the hotels were occupied in the Tsunami that occured in Southeast Asian-Indian Ocean in 2004 and 214,000 deaths, 140,000 losses and 34,000 injuries were reported. In a hospital with 215 beds, 4 operating rooms and 8 intensive care beds, 56% hip-leg, 34% shoulder-arm, 13.1% head-neck, 8.4% vertebra and 7.5% abdominal-chest were identifi ed as injuries respectively. While 87.8% of 107 patients who underwent surgery had ASA I characteristics, only 2 patients did not have fasting time. Halotan was used as the sole inhalation anesthetic. Only one patient was intubated and transferred to another hospital. While 69.2% general anesthesia was applied, 19.6% mask-general anesthesia, 4.7% TIVA 3.7% spinal anesthesia and 2.8% local anesthesia techniques were used. Aspiration, hypovolemia, sepsis, and lack of preoperative laboratory research were defi ned as the most common problems associated with anesthesia, while hypotension and oxygen desaturation were the most common intraoperative complications [21].
Although the teams came from other countries and despite the limited resources, many patients were successfully operated in the Haiti earthquake of 2010, oxygen beds, anesthesia machines, ventilators and monitors were not working in the 120-bed hospital. The anesthesia technique was USG-guided regional nerve blocks (from lumbar plexus block to… sciatic block). Only manual blood pressure and pulse oximetry were used as monitors. There were no problems in the postoperative period. In the article, it was emphasized that it should be kept in mind that general anesthesia may not be applied in many hospitals in disaster areas [22]. were used respectively [23].
In the 2005 Kashmir earthquake, another team reported that they intervened in 180 surgical patients and applied general anesthesia to 44% of the patients and also used ketamine at a rate of 41%. They stated that ketamine is a safe and suffi cient agent for anesthesia of surgical procedures performed in the fi eld due to the lack of complications and good surgeon satisfaction [24].
Sarfraz, et al. reported that 11.299 patients in their shared articles after the Sumatra tsunami used local anesthesia techniques at a rate of 90% since they did not even have an oxygen concentrator [25].
In the Haiti earthquake of 2010, because the nearby health centers were damaged, triage and attempts were made on the street, but after 2 weeks, the 120-bed hospital with 2 operating rooms could be built in the school gymnasium. 333 orthopedic surgeries were performed in this hospital within 3 months. Lower extremity injuries were more frequent. Amputation was performed in 14.6% of the patients. Six patients died despite all intervention [26].
They reported that they used a high rate of general anesthesia technique and shared the experiences of the distant region hospital in the 1999 Marmara earthquake and that the surgical type was mostly fasciotomy, amputation, reduction and fi xation of large bones and various debridement operations. They did not encounter intraoperative mortality [27].
In an article evaluating the role of anesthesiologists in the Lombok earthquake (564 dead, 1684 injured) in 2018, it was found that most of the injured needed orthopedic surgery due to trauma. Although it is not statistically signifi cant, general anesthesia is used more than regional anesthesia. The youngest patients were 1 day old and the oldest patients were 95 years old. Intubation and laryngeal mask airway were used in general anesthesia. Spinal anesthesia was preferred most frequently from regional blocks [28].
As long as we continue to live on earth, it is a reality to encounter natural disasters. It is clear that our professional group needs to adapt and be prepared. The fi rst step to being prepared for emergencies is to make a good risk assessment.
This risk assessment is then included in the emergency plan.