Open Access Review Article Article ID: AOR-1-107

    Scientific Evidence Regarding the Quality of Life of Total Laryngectomees

    Nemr K*, Raquel ACS, Takeshita-Monaretti TK, Pires-Buzanelli E, Simões-Zenari M and Aguiar-Ricz LA

    Introduction: The loss of laryngeal voice after total laryngectomy can have an impact on the quality of life and communication of affected individuals. Postoperative phonatory methods may promote advantages in oral communication and reduce the functional, organic and emotional changes experienced by the patients. On this basis, the objective of the present study was to review the literature in order to determine the impact on the quality of life of total laryngectomees according to the form of rehabilitation chosen after the procedure and to identify the protocols most frequently used to assess the quality of life of these individuals.

     Results and Discussion: The application of quality of life protocols reveals that total laryngectomees face an impact at the social, physical and psychological levels. Regarding the forms of rehabilitation, success can be achieved with any one of the phonatory methods used after total laryngectomy as long as the patients are guided by a speech therapist and monitored by a multidisciplinary team. Users have reported that a tracheoesophageal prosthesis produced a voice most similar to laryngeal voice, with better scores in the physical and socioemotional domains compared to other alaryngeal methods. A wide diversity of questionnaires used to assess quality of life was detected, those most frequently employed being the “Vocal Disadvantage Index” (VDI), “Quality of Life and Voice “(QLV) protocol, “Quality Assessment Questionnaire of Life at the University of Washington” (UW-QOL), “Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy” (FACT-H&N), “European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer” (EORTC QLQ-C30), and “Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short–Form Health Survey” (SF-36). Despite such diversity of protocols for assessment, the results demonstrate an increased voice quality (VQ) after alaryngeal rehabilitation. 

    Conclusion: The present review revealed that total laryngectomy has a relevant impact at the physical, emotional and psychological levels on the patients, as shown by most of the questionnaires applied. In general, the results of the present study revealed moderate VQ scores after total laryngectomy. The tracheoesophageal prosthesis yielded a better result in terms of quality of life because of its closer proximity to laryngeal voice compared to esophageal voice. 


    Published on: Oct 15, 2015 Pages: 37-45

    Full Text PDF Full Text HTML DOI: 10.17352/2455-1759.000007
    CrossMark Publons Harvard Library HOLLIS Search IT Semantic Scholar Get Citation Base Search Scilit OAI-PMH ResearchGate Academic Microsoft GrowKudos Universite de Paris UW Libraries SJSU King Library SJSU King Library NUS Library McGill DET KGL BIBLiOTEK JCU Discovery Universidad De Lima WorldCat VU on WorldCat


    Global Views

    Case Reports

    Peertechz Tweets

    Pinterest on AOR

    Help ? Google Reviews 11