Remote patient monitoring (RPM) has gain popularity over the last two decades. Initially sought after by large hospitals and academic institutions, RPM has shown benefits to patient management at all levels including solo practice. Majority of the companies we identified address two primary diagnosis, hypertension and diabetes. In an analysis of 10 companies we found cost structures varied greatly between vendors while equipment type did not. While there are numerous commonalities between vendors, each vendor differentiated itself through online dashboards and clinical pathways navigations. As the RPM market expands, it is important for physicians to have a structured approach to identifying vendors, selecting appropriate features and contracting with vendors. This article covers cost structures, commonalities and unique aspect of the vendors we reviewed.
Keywords:
Published on: Apr 21, 2020 Pages: 1-3
Full Text PDF
Full Text HTML
DOI: 10.17352/2581-4265.000039
CrossMark
Publons
Harvard Library HOLLIS
Search IT
Semantic Scholar
Get Citation
Base Search
Scilit
OAI-PMH
ResearchGate
Academic Microsoft
GrowKudos
Universite de Paris
UW Libraries
SJSU King Library
SJSU King Library
NUS Library
McGill
DET KGL BIBLiOTEK
JCU Discovery
Universidad De Lima
WorldCat
VU on WorldCat
PTZ: We're glad you're here. Please click "create a new query" if you are a new visitor to our website and need further information from us.
If you are already a member of our network and need to keep track of any developments regarding a question you have already submitted, click "take me to my Query."